Fear the Walking Dead Finale Review: The Good Man

Taking into consideration the fact that the new AMC show Fear the Walking Dead, companion series to the original juggernaut that is The Walking Dead, is a little slow-moving, maybe we can understand. It is about lifeless, undead hoards encroaching on the people of America. But when the plot moves slow”er than the shambling zombies themselves, we’re left wanting more. This weekend’s episode, “The Good Man”, was a power-hour of undead mayhem that provided a strong conclusion to the somewhat wobbly debut season.

 

As with the original series, and in spite of the show being ultimately about a zombie apocalypse, it’s the characters that are ultimately responsible for providing the driving force behind its success. For most of this first season, character development for some of the main characters was shaky at best, leaving the audience to wonder how long we’re expected to put up with whiny, self-absorbed teenagers and pacifistic, wavering adults. There were some standouts – particularly in the character of Daniel Salazar, who left us wondering right to the end if he should be considered friend or foe – but others stalled out before we could begin to care about them.

 

Fortunately, the season finale seemed to know exactly what we’d been craving; both a zombie buffet and an action-packed, life-or-death situation that forced any weak characters to literally develop or die, or in at least one case, to do both. Following the crucial information at the end of the previous week’s episode (namely that the Cobalt Command referred to the “humane extermination” of the civilian population prior to the military’s full evacuation) the season finale served to detail the search-and-rescue attempts made to reunite characters with those previously taken away by the military.

 

After two zombie-free episodes that firmly established the military as the bigger threat so far, Salazar’s strategy of releasing the 2,000 plus newly minted members of the undead community from the previously chained and barred arena gave us our first zombie herd of the new series and reminded us that the other threat to our main characters is never very far away. Doing so with such cold-blooded casualness further cemented the view that Salazar is either a valued ally or dangerous enemy.

 

This scene had the added bonus of further highlighting the arrogance of the military in assuming they could hold the upper hand simply by virtue of possessing the guns and ammo, an arrogance that quickly deteriorated into panic as they wasted round after round of said ammo firing wildly into the oncoming herd. It also emphasized the metaphorical nature of the “zombie” in pop culture as representative of contemporary fears of looming climate disaster. As in the case of a fictional zombie apocalypse, global warming may have been contained or possibly prevented if appropriate actions had been taken in the beginning instead of ignoring or discounting the signs and symptoms as they appeared.

 

Like him or hate him, the season finale finally furthered the complexity of Nick’s character as he showed himself an equal to his new friend, Victor Strand, a man with a murky past indeed. The other welcomed character change was seen in the development of Travis, who seemed to finally realize that his faith in the system would ultimately fail him and his family. From finally snapping and dealing with his frustration over having the soldier he chose to release come back and shoot a member of his group to having to face the reality that his ex-wife Liza was bitten, Travis has finally come to terms with the reality of his zombified world. It will be interesting to see whether this strengthens or breaks him in season two.

 

As with any good season finale, we’re left wanting more — luckily, you can catch anything you’ve missed online on AMC’s website, cable, and via Hulu. Season two, when it premieres, should hopefully continue the trajectory and momentum of season one, while giving us further insight into the strength of various characters. Just as with the original series, we can now confirm that no one makes it out alive without a fight.

Written by Maria Rosita

Prof Pic 1

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy.

Share
Posted in Guest Writer, The Walking Dead, TV | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Intriguing Story of Jason Statham’s Wild Card

wild_card_2015-1920x1200-2

As casino-themed movies go, up until recently they had relative cinematic success. You only have to reference the likes of Casino (1995) starring Robert Di Niro, Sharon Stone and Joe Pesci for proof that films showcasing the wonders of gambling can be big box office hits.

There are also the endless James Bond flicks that have seen the British secret spy flirt with casinos throughout his illustrious reign as cinema’s premier secret agent. However, it hasn’t all been positive of late for this somewhat aging genre. Although, underground hits like Rounders prevailed mainly due to its stellar cast (Robin Williams, Ed Norton, John Malkovich, Matt Damon), other films with much bigger budgets struggled to turn profits (Runner Runner, Poker Night) more recently.

So, what’s gone wrong?

It’s hard to say, as the gaming demographic is still relevant. Games such as poker have never been more popular and millions play around the world every day but the life seems to have been sucked out of the genre. Maybe there are only so many times you can glamorize the Vegas casinos before people got sick of having the bright lights of Sin City rammed down their throat constantly by big budget films.

Realistically, casino films haven’t seen a sizeable return on their investments since the glorious Ocean’s franchise – which we’ll come on to later in more depth. But why has this seemingly lucrative film niche lost its mainstream appeal?

hqdefault

Let’s take a look at the recent Jason Statham movie, Wild Card. It saw its global release this March, and regardless of its $30 million budget, the film performed dreadfully at the Box Office. In its first week in the United States it was said to have only taken a meager $3,201 at the Box Office, while also receiving some rather stinging reviews from some of the most respected movie hacks around.

Although, the film did perform a little better through Blu-ray and DVD sales it underperformed immeasurably, leaving many people questioning how in fact it got approved such a huge budget in the first place? With an underwhelming cast for such a big budget action film, it’s mystifying where the bulk of the $30 million actually went. Wild Card wasn’t full of huge action scenes – most notably because Statham’s character Nick Wild refused to carry out his duties with anything but his own aging fists.

Beneath the huge losses, questions were beginning to be asked as to how this film managed to get off the ground. And although there were 4 production companies helping fund the film (Current Entertainment, Quad Films, SJ Pictures, Sierra / Affinity) it was questioned whether they would commit to such an outlay themselves without significant external funding.

Thus, one of the theories being banded about is that Wild Card received the bulk of its funding through product placement. An old age form of marketing that has been prevalent in movies for decades, the theory is that Wild Card was funded by some of the casinos that are featured heavily in the film. You only have to look back at the hugely famous Ocean’s franchise to see how that was extremely successful in helping fund the film to a global market. Casinos like MGM Grand and the Bellagio were granted primetime coverage throughout the films as a way of injecting these grandeur establishments in the psyche of the viewing public. Let’s face it, the first thing anyone wants to do after watching a film like any of Ocean’s trilogy is to jump on a plane and experience Las Vegas for themselves.

Now Wild Card isn’t going to feature in any top 10 casino-themed film lists anytime soon, however the film isn’t actually as bad as its taking would have you believe. And although director Brian Koppelman (Rounders, Ocean’s Thirteen, Runner Runner) wouldn’t put his name to a film like Wild Card, it shouldn’t be completely dismissed by the casual action movie fan either.

screen_shot_2014-12-13_at_1.29.38_pm

Most of the action scenes utilize Statham to the best of his abilities, and are probably the most memorable moments of the film on a whole. But as Statham’s grip on his own personal “American Dream” goes through a series of twists, maybe it’s this drawn-out theme that moviegoers have seen enough of over the years. Casinos, since their inception have relied on subliminal messages like: “anyone can become rich playing at their establishments,” kinda motto through films and marketing strategies to help embed their services in the psyche of viewers. However, with Wild Card being labeled a “Box Office Bomb” by some media outlets, maybe it’s time moviemakers left this genre alone for a while.

The reality is that 95% of the people that step into casino come out with a lighter wallet than they walked in with. The old adage: “the house always wins,” may be finally kicking in with the viewing public and the reality of the scenes they are watching are becoming more disconnected from real life. And as true-to-life as Nick Wild may be, there are some ludicrous plot twists in Wild Card that induce the odd snigger.

Luckily for Statham, Wild Card was quickly overshadowed a month later by the release of the latest Fast 7 movies, and moviegoers soon forgot the pitfalls of Wild Card – if they even witnessed them in the first place.

Even if the Vegas casinos did bankroll the bulk of Wild Card, one thing is for sure, that industry professionals might want to think twice before assigning a huge budget to a Statham film in the future or even a casino-themed flick anytime soon.

Exclusively submitted to Action Flick Chick
Written by PopcornHoarder

Share
Posted in Guest Writer, movie | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Importance of Balanced Gender Representation in Games Young People Play

As parents, we try to bring our kids up to be respectful, intelligent, compassionate human beings. Among other important lessons, we try to teach them that girls can be anything they want to be, and that they can kick ass in any field they choose. However, it has long been known that many kids’ toys don’t really help reinforce this message. For that matter, neither do many movies or even kids’ games. Take action flicks, for example (for obvious reasons). How often are chicks the ones kicking ass? Not often enough. In fact, most of the time they’re the ones behind all the trouble, either being saved by the (male) heroes or making their work more difficult than it should be. Things are no different in video games.

mario-saves-peach

Women are grossly underrepresented in video games and in spite of making up 40% of the gaming population, they make up only 10% of the characters in the top 150 games. Further, even the roles they play are stereotypical. It is incredibly rare to find a woman as the main protagonist of a game. When women do appear in video games, it is often as a friend or girlfriend of the main (male) character, an oversexualised villain, mere eye candy or a damsel in distress. And this is not just about the games adults play.  As fun as the original Super Mario Bros. was, you could only play Mario or Luigi, and the only woman around was Princess Peach who needed to be rescued from the castle. But why is this such a big deal? It’s just a game, right? Wrong. These games send out messages that are the opposite of the ones we try to give our kids, and unless things change, they could have a negative impact on the way young people behave.

Here are five important ways young people are affected by the gender imbalance in video games.

1. Girls can’t play as girls

One of the most obvious problems with the inability to play as a female character is that girls can never play as girls. This can affect the way young female players think about themselves.

2. It also sends out other not-so-subtle messages such as, only guys can be ‘heroes’

When playing a video game, the goal is often to complete an important task. And if it’s impossible to complete said task as a woman, what exactly is that teaching young players? When there’s important work to be done, only men and boys are up to the task. Certainly not the kind of stuff I say to my daughter at home.

3. Girls do not have worthy role models in video games

Even when women do appear in roles of substance, they are often dressed in extremely scanty clothes, with unrealistic bodies. Portraying women this way suggests that no matter what their skills or abilities, their ultimate worth is in their sex appeal. This message is harmful for both boys and girls, encouraging boys to objectify women and encouraging girls to strive for ‘perfect’ looks.

4. Girls don’t feel at home in the world of gaming

While the number of women playing video games has certainly increased, a large portion of this demographic represents women who play mobile games. The number of women playing video games without female characters is still rather low, and part of this reason is because they don’t feel welcome in a world where you have no choice but to assume a male avatar. This in turn prevents them from relating to the world of video games, a field that is often credited for inspiring an interest in science, technology, engineering and math. It is no secret that the percentage of women working in the video games industry is hardly representative of the percentage of women in the workforce, and this could be one important reason behind that.

5. Boys feel that girls don’t belong in the world of gaming

Women gamers have often reported being abused once they reveal their gender to their fellow players. While this behaviour is certainly not the norm, it is highly unacceptable and surprising. Well, maybe not surprising.

When a game does not allow players to play as girls, it gives the female target audience a feeling that perhaps the game developers hold the same opinion as a portion of their customers. I am sure they would love to be proved wrong.

As parents, we want our kids to grow up in a balanced world, irrespective of their gender. When our kids spend considerable time on these immersive games, we as adults in our society, are collectively obligated to provide well balanced environments for the young in our society, real or virtual. What do you think?

Written by George Schalter

Author Bio

George Schalter loves being a dad. He and his wife share the joys and responsibilities of bringing up their two children. As believers of good all round education, they spend a lot of time playing with their children and spending time outdoors. As George is the writer in the family, he blogs at Educational Kids Games.

Facebook

Twitter

Google+

Share
Posted in action, Guest Writer, video game | Leave a comment

New Release: Kill the Freshman, a graphic novel by Alex Langley

Hello, everyone!

After ten-thousand gallons of blood, sweat, and tears, my first graphic novel is finally released. Behold, Kill the Freshman, a YA story that’s a cross between Mean Girls and Dragon Ball ZKTF_Cover

This novel wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for my dear friend Katrina, who helped produce this mamma-jamma, so for that (and many other things), I thank her dearly. If you’re interested in learning more, you can hop over here to check out the physical copy, or over here to check it on Kindle.

Need a little more about the story to wet your whistle? Well, then, read on!

KTF_VITREV SMALL

KILL THE FRESHMAN SYNOPSIS:

In junior high Vi may have been a nerdy outcast, but now that she’s a freshman, she’s going to get popular or die trying. Literally.

At the Gracewood Academy of Queens and Patriarchs, ancient magical mumbo-jumbo gives superhuman powers to students willing to take the ID cards (and lives) of their classmates. Underclassmen are the unwilling prey in this jungle, only safe from each other, and in certain parts of the school.

When Vi nearly dies courtesy of some sophomores, her motor mouth lands her a friendship with Allison Meadows, Gracewood’s apex senior, and into a student election that’s like The Hunger Games with gossip. Everyone is a target during the election— the weirdos in journalism (who Vi secretly kinda likes), Allison (who Vi secretly kinda fears), and even Vi herself (who Vi secretly kinda loathes). To save her newfound friends, this fast-talking freshman will risk everything she cares about most: being popular, being herself, and being alive (in that order).

KtF Promo Art 4

Creator/Writer: Alex Langley (@rocketllama)

Producer Prime: Katrina Hill (@actionchick)

Art Team: Marko Head, Greg Fischer, Rian Sygh, and Nick Langley

 

Share
Posted in announcement | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Fear the Walking Dead – Should We Be Afraid?

b8dd90fd-0828-34fa-13eb-3f016f46c9dc_FTWDCC_Horizontal_Flat_National_LR

I, like most fans of The Walking Dead, am just itching for the next season, which premieres October, 11th. But, what is a fan to do in the meantime? We’ve probably all watched the re-make of Dawn of the Dead more than once, or satisfied our need for undead entertainment on the El Rey Network with re-runs of From Dusk ‘til Dawn (check here and here for local listings), and fantasized about the Halloween premiere of Ash vs. The Evil Dead. But, as far as The Walking Dead goes, you can’t get much closer, or better, than the AMC spin-off series Fear the Walking Dead. Starring some recognizable faces, such as Kim Dickens (Treme and Deadwood) and Rubén Blades (Once Upon a Time in Mexico and Predator 2), this prequel offers some insight into the very beginning of the zombie apocalypse, contradictory to where The Walking Dead picks up with Rick Grimes in a hospital bed.

a2b72564-e2c9-1be4-f55c-4eb6d7b57b5e_FTWD_CastComposite_RGB_V3

Although it seems to start off at a sleepy pace, judging by what I’ve seen so far, this series will be nothing but action packed. Most Walking Dead fans will remember the pace of season 5, and probably shouted at the screen a few times to “get on with it!” as I did. Fear the Walking Dead promises to go full-throttle from the get-go – plunging us into the zombie apocalypse as if it were happening in real-time.

Fear the Walking Dead starts off as most zombie movies do – it was just a normal day – until…  Robert Kirkman describes entering the realm of Fear the Walking Dead as that there is the “revelation that the outbreak would appear to happen behind the scenes at first, with news stories that don’t make sense and paranoia emerging.” Subtle. No little walker kids at a gas station, poised to eat your face. This is how we all imagine it will be. In the ways that Shaun of the Dead stumbled drunkenly into the apocalypse, or picking up the pieces several hours or months after the outbreak as in Night of the Living Dead or Warm Bodies — we don’t have a plan – and, neither do they.

7866023c-23af-54b5-2def-f9008c00f28b_FTWD_101_JL_0122_0306

Again, as a huge fan of The Walking Dead, I was a little scrunchy-faced about the idea of a spin-off series. Then, I saw the cast. Then, I saw the trailer. Now, I have no doubt that this companion will bring the walker universe full-circle in a way that no other film or T.V. franchise has ever been able to do. The sheer production value of Fear the Walking Dead has me sold. While we won’t seem to have as many practical make-up effects as The Walking Dead, (at least, not yet) the heart-pounding, hand-held, quick-edit style of the show looks akin to Quarantine, and in a few places, like Cloverfield. I say that only because it does not appear that we will see our villainous skull-sucking, flesh-eaters right away. Of course, we all know that hiding the monster makes it all the scarier.

There is still some speculation as to how Fear the Walking Dead is going to play out.  Will it surpass its predecessor?  Will it succeed as a stand-alone?  Judging by what I have seen in terms of casting and production – it will certainly hold its ground.  Hopefully, it can go beyond that and establish itself in the Zombie-verse as its own spine-tingling narrative.

Written by Maria Rosita

Prof Pic 1

Maria is a writer interested in comic books, cycling, and horror films. Her hobbies include cooking, doodling, and finding local shops around the city. She currently lives in Chicago with her two pet turtles, Franklin and Roy.

 

Share
Posted in Coming Attractions, Guest Writer, horror, R-rated, The Walking Dead, TV | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SDCC 2015: Supernatural Panel Gets Kicked in the Balls by Audience Member Question

Supernatural-supernatural-30545991-1680-1050

Beware! Supernatural spoiler below!

After just finishing its tenth season, Supernatural’s stars and writers attended San Diego Comic Con to hype up season eleven and give fans a chance to ask their long-burning questions about the series. It’s no secret that Supernatural has a predominately female fan base, and yet the cast of the show remains all male after all these years. Women characters have rarely lasted more than a few episodes, so when Charlie Bradbury (Felicia Day) kept showing up fans got really excited. Do we finally get a long running female character as an island of estrogen amidst the monotonous testosterone sea? NOPE! She died and fans are pissed.

At SDCC, the Supernatural panel was held in Hall H with roughly 6,500 people in attendance. The panelists included writers Jeremy Carver and Andrew Dabb, series cast members Jared Padalecki, Jensen Ackles, Misha Collins, and Mark A. Sheppard, and moderated by “Ghostfacers” Rob Benedict and Richard Speight Jr. When it was time for audience members to ask questions, one kicked the panel in the balls in all the right ways by asking, “Considering that women have often been used to further the plot of male characters, why was the decision made to kill Charlie and dump her in a bathtub?” The crowd went wild, me included because I’ve wanted to ask that question for so long! Finally someone asks the writers about this in a public place where they can’t dodge it. The panel’s response? The moderators duck down behind the podium, Padalecki completely turns his chair around, Ackles scoots his chair way back and puts his feet up on the table, the others turn their backs pretending to be distracted, leaving writer Jeremy Carver to fend for himself. I could not have been more pumped!

Carver stammers and sputters for about a full minute before saying that he doesn’t really have an answer, and that Charlie dying is ‘where the story took them.’ His lack of an answer tells us everything we need to know. There is no good reason other than Charlie is a woman they ultimately don’t give two poops about. You can watch this glorious kick in the balls at approximately 35 minutes in the video below. Ackles tries to help Carver out after a few minutes by saying that we should be happy with the fact that we got Charlie for more episodes than originally planned, and I call bullshit. I don’t blame Ackles for trying to help out his friend who was sinking under the pressure but that is the most craptacular answer. Wasn’t Castiel only supposed to be around for a few episodes, too? Yet he’s still here, years later. Thank you, audience member Abigail, for asking this question and making my day.

This is the Action Flick Chick, and you’ve just been kicked in the ass!

Share
Posted in action, convention, interviews, News, TV | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

San Diego Comic-Con 2015: Missing Marvel, Dangerous Women, and Hell No- Sharkado!

san-diego-comic-con-logo

San Diego Comic Con is approaching quickly, and the panel/activity announcements are flooding in. One of this year’s biggest pieces of SDCC news is about Marvel in that they have pulled out of doing any panels in Hall H, leaving DC to jump on that extra time like a Decepticon on energon. Between Marvel dropping out and ridiculous shenanigans that go on in Hall H (fighting over seats, stabbing people with pens, and camping in line for three days), that pretty  much seals the coffin of my disinterest in ever trying to get into Hall H again.

If you happen to be going, I will be taking part in two mighty fine panels. Firstly, you can find me moderating the Psychology of Cult TV, a panel organized by the sagacious Dr. Janina Scarlet. Alongside Dr. Scarlet, you’ll find panelists Dr. Travis Langley, Dr. Billy San Juan, pop culture expert Alan Kistler, and the author of the Geek Handbook, Alex Langley.

The panel is in room 25ABC, Thursday, 8-9pm

You can also find me at this year’s installment of the Most Dangerous Women at Comic-Con: The Good, The Bad, and the Deadly. You can all name a favorite villain or two: the Joker, Darth Vader, or Loki. But how many of your favorite bad guys are actually bad girls? Here to discuss the best and baddest of the lady villains (and their lack of representation) is a panel of women equally dangerous in their own right: Jenna Busch (founder of Legion of Leia, co-host of Most Craved), Susan Eisenberg (Justice League, Destiny), Jane Espenson (Once Upon a Time, Husbands), Jacqueline Goehner (costume designer, cosplayer), Katrina Hill (Action Movie Freak, The Walking Dead Psychology), Makayla Lynn (Legendary Digital Networks, Nerdist), Chase Masterson (The Flash, Star Trek: Deep Space 9), Dr. Janina Scarlet (Superhero Therapy, Star Wars Psychology), Stephanie Thorpe (The Ladies & The Gents, ElfQuest: A Fan Imagining), and Jessica Tseang (comics historian, founder of Little Geek Girls). Room 25ABC

This panel will be Thursday, July 9 5-6 pm.

In addition to being on panels, there are several I’m excited to see myself, especially those from the dependably nutso Syfy Channel. This year Syfy will be bringing talent from their brand new shows, Childhood’s End and The Expanse, alongside Dominion, Z Nation, and 12 Monkeys. But wait, they will also have the cast of…Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No! The Hoff-man himself is listed to be there from the Syfy press release: “Join stars Ian Ziering (Fin Shepard), Tara Reid (April Wexler), Cassie Scerbo (Nova Clarke) and David Hasselhoff (Gil Shepard), director Anthony C. Ferrante and writer Thunder Levin for a fin-tastic behind-the-scenes journey into the global pop culture sensation followed by a Q&A session. Moderated by Damian Holbrook of TV Guide Magazine.”  

STARZ will present panels for Outlander and their new series Ash vs. Evil Dead.  Talent for Outlander includes executive producer Ronald D. Moore, author Diana Gabaldon, and actors Caitriona Balfe and Sam Heughan; and for Ash vs. Evil Dead talent present will be Sam Raimi, Rob Tapert, Bruce “Don’t Call Me Ash” Campbell, Lucy Lawless, Craig Digregorio, and Ivan Raimi. After the season finale of Outlander, I’m very interested to see what the cast has to say about what’s next. I’m beyond excited for Ash vs. Evil Dead! 

Below you will find a list of Syfy’s panels, times and locations from the press release.

This is the Action Flick Chick, and you’ve just been kicked in the ass!

 Friday, July 10

SHARKNADO 3: OH HELL NO!

PANEL: 7:15pm – 8:15pm | Room 6A

Join stars Ian Ziering (Fin Shepard), Tara Reid (April Wexler), Cassie Scerbo (Nova Clarke) and David Hasselhoff (Gil Shepard), director Anthony C. Ferrante and writer Thunder Levin for a fin-tastic behind-the-scenes journey into the global pop culture sensation followed by a Q&A session. Moderated by Damian Holbrook of TV Guide Magazine.  

 Saturday, July 11

CHILDHOOD’S END

PANEL: 11:00am – 12:00pm | Indigo Ballroom, Hilton Bayfront Hotel

Based on the Arthur C. Clarke classic novel, the upcoming six-hour miniseries stars Mike Vogel (Bates Motel), Julian McMahon (Nip/Tuck), Daisy Betts (Last Resort), and Yael Stone (Orange is the New Black). The cast will be on hand along with screenwriter Matthew Graham (Doctor Who) to discuss how they brought the iconic novel to the screen for the very first time.

12 MONKEYS

PANEL: 12:00pm – 1:00pm | Indigo Ballroom, Hilton Bayfront Hotel

Join executive producers Terry Matalas and Travis Fickett, and stars Aaron Stanford (James Cole), Amanda Schull (Dr. Cassandra Railly), Kirk Acevedo (Ramse),Barbara Sukowa (Jones),  Emily Hampshire (Jennifer Goines) and Todd Stashwick (Deacon) of Syfy’s critically-acclaimed series as they dissect the mysteries of the first season and hint at the twists and turns coming in Season 2. Moderated by Natalie Abrams of Entertainment Weekly.

THE EXPANSE

SCREENING AND PANEL: 4:00pm – 5:30pm | Indigo Ballroom, Hilton Bayfront Hotel

Join the cast members Thomas Jane (The Punisher), Steven Strait (Magic City), Shohreh Aghdashloo (The House of Sand and Fog), Cas Anvar (Olympus),Dominique Tipper (Vampire Academy) and Wes Chatham (The Hunger Games: Mockingjay) and executive producers Mark FergusHawk Ostby and Naren Shankar for a first-ever, exclusive screening of the series premiere before it airs on Syfy in December! The Expanse is set 200 years in the future after mankind has colonized the solar system. The show is based on The New York Times bestselling book series.

Moderated by book author James S.A. Corey (Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck).

Z NATION

PANEL:  5:30pm – 6:30pm | Indigo Ballroom, Hilton Bayfront Hotel

Dust off the Z-Whackers and join cast members DJ Qualls (Citizen Z), Kellita Smith (Warren), Keith Allan (Murphy), Russell Hodgkinson (Doc), Nat Zang (10K) andAnastasia Baranova (Addy) and executive producer Karl Schaefer of fan-favorite zombie show, Z Nation, as they provide a behind-the-scenes look at what fans can expect to see this fall when Season 2 premieres on Syfy. Moderated by Z Nation writer-producer Craig Engler.

 

Share
Posted in action, announcement, News, TV | Leave a comment

AFC Classic: 14 Reasons Why Die Hard is Pretty Much the Best Action Movie Ever

john-mcclane-zippo-lighter-die-hard-blu-ray-cap

I was interviewed recently on the influence of Die Hard in the action genre, and, while I was mulling it over in my head, all these little details started sticking out about the flick, making me realize how much care went into the making of it. Then I found Janice Hardy’s wonderful article about the Seamless Plotting of Die Hard and everything fell into place. Die Hard isn’t the average action film by any means- it’s the little details in the plot and characters that give it the extra oomph to push it onto just about every persons’ “Best Action Movie” list. Expanding on the above article, here are some of the reasons why Die Hard is pretty much the best action movie ever.

 

  1. John McClane being barefoot is set up in the first scene and continues to be an important factor throughout the film.
  2. The Rolex watch mentioned in the beginning of the film comes into play later when Hans Gruber catches on to it.
  3. Holly flips over the picture of her family, preventing Hans from connecting her to her family (and McClane) until late in the movie.
  4. McClane is never shown as incompetent just to keep the story moving.
  5. McClane doesn’t give in to Hans’ threats: Hans says to give him the detonators or Ellis dies, and McClane says nothing. He prioritizes the good of the whole over the good over one (kind of douchey) dude.
  6. The characters are well developed, even down to the lowest henchman, which doesn’t happen often in action movies. More often than not, the henchmen are generic bad guys with no personality.
  7. Argyle, the limo driver, could have been a passing extra, but is given a personality by showing him hanging out in the limo, listening to music, completely oblivious to what’s going on for most of the film.
  8. Karl, Hans secondhand man, had a brother who McClane kills early on, giving Karl a personal vendetta against McClane, one which he values above even following Hans’ orders.
  9. Hans’ computer hacker is gleeful and apathetic about the violence going on around him.
  10. One henchman, with gun in hand, is posed and ready for the police to attack when he sees some candy. He slowly reaches down and grabs a candy bar even though there’s an impending attack.
  11. Al Powell, a character not introduced until late in the film, gets an entire backstory and character arc.
  12. Alan Rickman is brilliant.
  13. Hans Gruber is brilliantly evil.
  14. John McClane is a witty, snarky, badass with a human touch.

What are your thoughts on why Die Hard is (or isn’t- there’s room for other opinions even if they’re wrong :P) the best action movie ever?

This is the Action Flick Chick, and you’ve just been kicked in the ass!

Share
Posted in 5 kabooms, action, trivia | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment